home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1993-07-08 | 110.4 KB | 3,190 lines |
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
-
-
-
- Evolution of the Interfaces Group of MIB-II
-
- 28 June 1993
-
-
- Keith McCloghrie
- Hughes LAN Systems
- kzm@hls.com
-
- Frank J. Kastenholz
- FTP Software
- kasten@ftp.com
-
-
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are
- working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force
- (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other
- groups may also distribute working documents as Internet
- Drafts.
-
- Internet Drafts are valid for a maximum of six months and may
- be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
- time. It is inappropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference
- material or to cite them other than as a "work in progress".
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 1]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- 1. Introduction
-
- MIB-II [4] is the core set of managed objects defined for use
- by network management of the Internet suite of protocols.
- MIB-II was defined using the SNMPv1 Network Management
- Framework.
-
- This memo discusses the 'interfaces' group of MIB-II,
- especially the experience gained from the definition of
- numerous media-specific MIB modules for use in conjunction
- with the 'interfaces' group for managing various sub-layers
- beneath the internetwork-layer. It proposes clarifications
- to, and extensions of, the architectural issues within the
- current model used for the 'interfaces' group.
-
- This memo also includes a MIB module. As well as including
- new MIB definitions to support the architectural extensions,
- this MIB module also re-specifies the 'interfaces' group of
- MIB-II in a manner which is both compliant to the SNMPv2 SMI
- and semantically-identical to the existing SNMPv1-based
- definitions.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 2]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- 2. The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework
-
- The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework consists of four major
- components. They are:
-
- o RFC 1442 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for
- describing and naming objects for the purpose of
- management.
-
- o RFC 1213 defines MIB-II, the core set of managed objects
- for the Internet suite of protocols.
-
- o RFC 1445 which defines the administrative and other
- architectural aspects of the framework.
-
- o RFC 1448 which defines the protocol used for network
- access to managed objects.
-
- The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the
- purpose of experimentation and evaluation.
-
-
- 2.1. Object Definitions
-
- Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store,
- termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the
- MIB are defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation
- One (ASN.1) defined in the SMI. In particular, each object
- object type is named by an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an
- administratively assigned name. The object type together with
- an object instance serves to uniquely identify a specific
- instantiation of the object. For human convenience, we often
- use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to refer to the
- object type.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 3]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- 3. Experience with the Interfaces Group
-
- One of the strengths of internetwork-layer protocols such as
- IP [6] is that they are designed to run over any network
- interface. In achieving this, IP considers any and all
- protocols it runs over as a single "network interface" layer.
- A similar view is taken by other internetwork-layer protocols.
- This concept is represented in MIB-II by the 'interfaces'
- group which defines a generic set of managed objects such that
- any network interface can be managed in an interface-
- independent manner through these managed objects. The
- 'interfaces' group provides the means for additional managed
- objects specific to particular types of network interface
- (e.g., a specific medium such as Ethernet) to be defined as
- extensions to the 'interfaces' group for media-specific
- management. Since the standardization of MIB-II, many such
- media-specific MIB modules have been defined.
-
- Experience in defining these media-specific MIB modules has
- shown that the model defined by MIB-II is too simplistic
- and/or static for some types of media-specific management. As
- a result, some of these media-specific MIB modules have
- assumed an evolution/loosening of the model. This memo is a
- proposal to document/standardize the evolution of the model
- and to fill in the gaps caused by that evolution.
-
- A previous effort to extend the interfaces group resulted in
- the publication of RFC 1229 [7]. As part of defining the
- evolution of the interfaces group, this memo applies that
- evolution to, and thereby incorporates the RFC 1229
- extensions.
-
-
- 3.1. Areas of Clarification/Revision
-
- There are seven areas for which experience indicates that
- clarification, revision, or extension of the model would be
- helpful. The next sections discuss these.
-
-
- 3.1.1. Interface Numbering
-
- MIB-II defines an object, ifNumber, whose value represents:
-
- "The number of network interfaces (regardless of their
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 4]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- current state) present on this system."
-
- Each interface is identified by a unique value of the ifIndex
- object, and the description of ifIndex constrains its value as
- follows:
-
- "Its value ranges between 1 and the value of ifNumber.
- The value for each interface must remain constant at
- least from one re-initialization of the entity's network
- management system to the next re-initialization."
-
- This constancy requirement on the value of ifIndex for a
- particular interface is vital for efficient management.
- However, an increasing number of devices allow for the dynamic
- addition/removal of network interfaces. One example of this
- is a dynamic ability to configure the use of SLIP/PPP over a
- character-oriented port. For such dynamic additions/removals,
- the combination of the constancy requirement and the
- restriction that the value of ifIndex is less than ifNumber is
- problematic.
-
-
- 3.1.2. Interface Sub-Layers
-
- Experience in defining media-specific management information
- has shown the need to distinguish between the multiple sub-
- layers beneath the internetwork-layer. In addition, there is
- a need to manage these sub-layers in devices (e.g., MAC-layer
- bridges) which are unaware of which, if any, internetwork
- protocols run over these sub-layers. As such, a model of
- having a single conceptual row in the interfaces table (MIB-
- II's ifTable) represent a whole interface underneath the
- internetwork-layer, and having a single associated media-
- specific MIB module (referenced by the ifSpecific object) is
- too simplistic. A further problem arises with the value of
- the ifType object which has enumerated values for each type of
- interface.
-
- Consider, for example, an interface with PPP running over an
- HDLC link which uses a RS232-like connector. Each of these
- sub-layers has its own media-specific MIB module. If all of
- this is represented by a single conceptual row in the ifTable,
- then an enumerated value for ifType is needed for that
- specific combination, and that row's ifSpecific variable can
- "point" to only one of the three media-specific MIB modules.
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 5]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- Furthermore, even if there was a convention for deciding which
- MIB module is referenced by ifSpecific then there is still a
- lack of a method to describe the relationship of all the sub-
- layers of the MIB stack.
-
- An associated problem is that of upward and downward
- multiplexing of the sub-layers. An example of upward
- multiplexing is MLP (Multi-Link) which provides load-sharing
- over several serial lines by appearing as a single point-to-
- point link to the sub-layer(s) above. An example of downward
- multiplexing would be several instances of PPP, each running
- over a Frame Relay virtual circuit, all of which run over the
- same ISDN B channel. The current MIB structure does not allow
- for these sorts of relationships to be described.
-
-
- 3.1.3. Virtual Circuits
-
- Several of the sub-layers for which media-specific MIB modules
- have been defined are connection oriented (e.g., Frame Relay,
- X.25). Experience has shown that each effort to define such a
- MIB module revisits the question of whether separate
- conceptual rows in the ifTable are needed for each virtual
- circuit. Most, if not all, of these efforts to date have
- decided to have all virtual circuits reference a single
- conceptual row in the ifTable.
-
-
- 3.1.4. Bit and Character Oriented Interfaces
-
- RS-232 is an example of a character-oriented sub-layer over
- which (e.g., through use of PPP) IP datagrams can be sent.
- Due to the packet-based nature of many of the objects in the
- ifTable, experience has shown that it is not appropriate to
- have a character-oriented sub-layer represented by a (whole)
- conceptual row in the ifTable.
-
- Experience has also shown that it is sometimes desirable to
- have some management information for bit-oriented interfaces,
- which are similarly difficult to represent by a (whole)
- conceptual row in the ifTable. For example, to manage the
- channels of a DS1 circuit, where only some of the channels are
- carrying packet-based data.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 6]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- 3.1.5. Counter Size
-
- As the speed of network media increase, the minimum time in
- which a 32 bit counter will wrap decreases. For example, on
- an Ethernet, a stream of back-to-back, full-size packets will
- cause ifInOctets to wrap in just over 57 minutes, for a T3
- line, the minimum wrap-time is just over 12 minutes, and for
- FDDI, it will wrap in 5.7 minutes. For a 1-gigabit medium,
- the counter might wrap in as little as 34 seconds. Requiring
- that interfaces be polled frequently enough not to miss a
- counter wrap will be increasingly problematic.
-
-
- 3.1.6. Interface Speed
-
- Network speeds are increasing. IfSpeed is limited to reporting
- a maximum speed of (2**31)-1 bits/second, or approximately
- 2.2Gbs. SONET defines an OC-48 interface, which is defined at
- operating at 48 times 51 Mbs, which is a speed in excess of
- 2.4gbits. Thus, ifSpeed will be of diminishing utility over
- the next several years.
-
-
- 3.1.7. Multicast/Broadcast Counters
-
- The counters in the ifTable for packets addressed to a
- multicast or the broadcast address, are combined as counters
- of non-unicast packets. In contrast, the ifExtensions MIB [7]
- defines one set of counters for multicast, and a separate set
- for broadcast packets. With the separate counters, the
- original combined counters become redundant.
-
-
- 3.2. Clarifications/Revisions
-
- The following clarifications and/or revisions are proposed.
-
-
- 3.2.1. Interface Numbering
-
- One solution to the interface numbering problem would be to
- redefine ifNumber to be the largest value of ifIndex, but the
- utility of such an object is questionable, and such a re-
- definition would require ifNumber to be deprecated. Thus, an
- improvement would be to deprecate ifNumber and not replace it.
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 7]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- However, the deprecation of ifNumber would require a change to
- that portion of ifIndex's definition which refers to ifNumber.
- So, since the definition of ifIndex must be changed anyway in
- order to solve the problem, changes to ifNumber do not benefit
- the solution.
-
- The solution adopted in this memo is just to delete the
- requirement that the value of ifIndex must be less than the
- value of ifNumber, and to retain ifNumber with its current
- definition. It could be argued that this is a change in the
- semantics of ifIndex; however, all existing implementations
- conform to this new definition, and in the interests of not
- requiring changes in existing implementations and in the many
- existing media-specific MIBs, it is proposed that this change
- does not require ifIndex to be deprecated.
-
- This solution also results in the possibility of "holes" in
- the ifTable, i.e., the ifIndex values of conceptual rows in
- the ifTable are not necessarily contiguous, but SNMP's GetNext
- (and SNMPv2's GetBulk) operation easily deals with such holes.
- The value of ifNumber still represents the number of
- conceptual rows, which increases/decreases as new interfaces
- are dynamically added/removed. The vital constancy
- requirement is met by requiring that after an interface is
- dynamically removed, its ifIndex value is not re-used (by
- another dynamically added interface) until after the following
- re-initialization of the network management system. This
- avoids the need for a priori assignment of ifIndex values for
- all possible interfaces which might be added dynamically.
-
- Because of the restriction of the value of ifIndex to be less
- than ifNumber, interfaces have been numbered with small
- integer values. This has led to the ability by humans to use
- the ifIndex values as (somewhat) user-friendly names for
- network interfaces (e.g., "interface number 3"). With the
- relaxation of the restriction on the value of ifIndex, there
- is now the possibility that ifIndex values could be assigned
- as very large numbers (e.g., memory addresses). Such numbers
- would be much less user-friendly. Therefore, this memo
- recommends that ifIndex values still be assigned as small
- integer values starting at 1, even though the values in use at
- any one time are not necessarily contiguous. (Note that this
- makes it easy for agents which dynamically add new interfaces,
- to remember which values have been assigned.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 8]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- This proposed change introduces a new problem of its own.
- Previously, there usually was a simple, direct, mapping of
- interfaces to the physical ports on systems. This mapping
- would be based on the ifIndex value. However, by removing the
- previous restrictions on the values allowed for ifIndex, along
- with the interface sub-layer concept (see the following
- section), mapping from interfaces to physical ports becomes
- increasingly problematic.
-
- To address this issue, a new object, ifName, is added to the
- MIB. This object contains the host's name for the interface
- of which the relevant ifEntry is a component. For example, if
- a router has an interface named wan1, which is composed of PPP
- running over an RS-232 port, the ifName objects for the PPP
- and RS-232 ifEntrys will contain the string "wan1".
-
-
- 3.2.2. Interface Sub-Layers
-
- One possible but not recommended solution to the problem of
- representing multiple sub-layers would be to retain the
- concept of one conceptual row for all the sub-layers of an
- interface and have each media-specific MIB module identify its
- "superior" and "subordinate" sub-layers through OBJECT
- IDENTIFIER "pointers". The drawbacks of this scheme are: 1)
- that the superior/subordinate pointers are contained in the
- media-specific MIB modules, and thus, a manager could not
- learn the structure of an interface, without inspecting
- multiple pointers in different MIB modules; this is overly
- complex and only possible if the manager has knowledge of all
- the relevant media-specific MIB modules; 2) current MIB
- modules would all need to be retrofitted with these new
- "pointers"; 3) this scheme does not adequately address the
- problem of upward and downward multiplexing; and 4) enumerated
- values of ifType are needed for each combination of sub-
- layers.
-
- Another possible but not recommended scheme would be to retain
- the concept of one conceptual row for all the sub-layers of an
- interface and have a new separate MIB table to identify the
- "superior" and "subordinate" sub-layers and to contain OBJECT
- IDENTIFIER "pointers" to media-specific MIBs. Effectively,
- one conceptual row in the ifTable would represent each
- combination of sub-layers between the internetwork-layer and
- the wire. While this scheme has fewer drawbacks, it would
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 9]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- deprecate the use of ifSpecific and it still does not support
- downward multiplexing, such as PPP over MLP: since MLP makes
- two (or more) serial lines appear to the layers above as a
- single physical interface, PPP over MLP should appear to the
- internetwork-layer as a single interface; this scheme,
- however, would result in two (or more) conceptual rows in the
- ifTable, both of which the internetwork-layer would run over.
- This scheme also requires enumerated values of ifType for each
- combination of sub-layers.
-
- The solution adopted in this memo is to have an individual
- conceptual row in the ifTable to represent each sub-layer, and
- have a new separate MIB table (the ifStackTable, see section 4
- of this memo) to identify the "superior" and "subordinate"
- sub-layers through INTEGER "pointers" to the appropriate
- conceptual rows in the ifTable. This solution supports both
- upward and downward multiplexing, allows the ifSpecific
- pointer in each conceptual row of the ifTable to point to the
- media-specific MIB module for that sub-layer, such that the
- new table need only be referenced to obtain information about
- layering, and it only requires enumerated values of ifType for
- each sub-layer, not for combinations of them. However, it
- does require that the descriptions of some objects in the
- ifTable (specifically, ifType, ifPhysAddress, ifInUcastPkts,
- and ifOutUcastPkts) be generalized so as to apply to any sub-
- layer (rather than only to a sub-layer immediately beneath the
- network layer, as at present), plus some (specifically,
- ifSpeed) which need to have appropriate values identified for
- use when a generalized definition does not apply to a
- particular sub-layer.
-
- In addition, this adopted solution makes no requirement that a
- device, in which a sub-layer is instrumented by a conceptual
- row of the ifTable, be aware of whether an internetwork
- protocol runs on top of (i.e., at some layer above) that sub-
- layer.
-
- The designer of a medium-specific MIB must decide whether to
- divide the interface into sub-layers or not, and if so, how to
- make the divisions. The following guidance is offered to
- assist the medium-specific MIB designer in these decisions.
-
- In general, the number of entries in the ifTable should be
- kept to the minimum required for network management. In
- particular, a group of related interfaces should be treated as
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 10]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- a single interface with one entry in the ifTable providing
- that:
-
- (1) None of the group of interfaces performs multiplexing for
- any other interface in the agent,
-
- (2) There is a meaningful and useful way for all of the
- ifTable's information (e.g., the counters, and the status
- variables), and all of the ifTable's capabilities (e.g.,
- write access to ifAdminStatus), to apply to the group of
- interfaces as a whole.
-
- Under these circumstances, there should be one ifEntry for
- such a group of interfaces, and any internal structure which
- needs to be represented to network management should be
- captured in a MIB module specific to the particular type of
- interface.
-
- Note that application of bullet 2 above to the ifTable's
- ifSpecific and ifType objects requires that there is a
- meaningful medium- specific MIB and a meaningful ifType value
- which apply to the group of interfaces as a whole. For
- example, it is not appropriate to treat an HDLC sub-layer and
- an RS-232 sub-layer as a single ifTable entry when the
- medium-specific MIBs and the ifType values for HDLC and RS-232
- are separate (rather than combined).
-
- These guidelines are just that, guidelines. The designer of a
- medium-specific MIB is free to lay out the MIB in whatever
- manner is desired.
-
- However, regardless of a medium-specific MIB's design, the
- designer of a medium-specific MIB must completely state the
- sub-layering model used for the MIB, and provide the
- assumptions, reasoning, and rationale used to develop that
- model.
-
-
- 3.2.3. Virtual Circuits
-
- This memo recommends that, in general, connection-oriented
- sub-layers do not have a conceptual row in the ifTable for
- each virtual circuit. This avoids the proliferation of
- conceptual rows, especially those which have considerable
- redundant information. (Note, as a comparison, that
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 11]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- connection-less sub-layers do not have conceptual rows for
- each remote address.) There may, however, be circumstances
- under which it is appropriate for a virtual circuit of a
- connection-oriented sub-layer to have its own conceptual row
- in the ifTable; an example of this might be PPP over a Frame
- Relay virtual circuit. The MIB in section 4 of this memo
- supports such circumstances.
-
-
- 3.2.4. Bit and Character Oriented Interfaces
-
- About half the objects in the ifTable are applicable to every
- type of interface: packet-oriented, character-oriented, and
- bit-oriented. Of the other half, two are applicable to both
- character-oriented and packet-oriented interfaces, and the
- rest are applicable only to packet-oriented interfaces. Thus,
- while it is desirable for consistency to be able to represent
- any/all types of interfaces in the ifTable, it is not possible
- to implement the full ifTable for bit- and character-oriented
- sub-layers.
-
- One possible but not recommended solution to this problem
- would be to split the ifTable into two (or more) new MIB
- tables, one of which would contain objects that are relevant
- only to packet-oriented interfaces (e.g. PPP), and another
- that may be used by all interfaces. This is highly
- undesirable since it would require changes in every agent
- implementing the ifTable (i.e., just about every existing SNMP
- agent).
-
- The solution adopted in this memo builds upon the fact that
- compliance statements in SNMPv2 (in contrast to SNMPv1) refer
- to object groups, where object groups are explicitly defined
- by listing the objects they contain. Thus, in SNMPv2,
- multiple compliance statements can be specified, one for all
- interfaces and additional ones for specific types of
- interfaces. The separate compliance statements can be based
- on separate object groups, where the object group for all
- interfaces can contain only those objects from the ifTable
- which are appropriate for every type of interfaces. Using
- this solution, every sub-layer can have its own conceptual row
- in the ifTable.
-
- Thus, the following section contains definitions of the
- objects of the existing 'interfaces' group of MIB-II, in a
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 12]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- manner which is both SNMPv2-compliant and semantically-
- equivalent to the existing MIB-II definitions. With
- equivalent semantics, and with the BER ("on the wire")
- encodings unchanged, these definitions retain the same OBJECT
- IDENTIFIER values as assigned by MIB-II. Thus, no rewrite of
- existing agents is required.
-
- Three new object groups are defined: the ifGeneralGroup
- containing those objects applicable to all types of network
- interfaces; the ifCharacterGroup containing those objects
- applicable to character-oriented (but not packet-oriented)
- network interfaces; and the ifPacketGroup containing those
- objects applicable only to packet-oriented network interfaces.
-
-
- 3.2.5. Counter Size
-
- Two approaches to addressing the shrinking minimum counter-
- wrap time problem were evaluated. Counters could be scaled,
- for example, ifInOctets could be changed to count received
- octets in, e.g., 1024 byte blocks. Alternatively, the size of
- the counter could be increased.
-
- Scaling the counters was rejected. While it provides
- acceptable performance at high count rates, at low rates it
- suffers. If there is little traffic on an interface, there
- might be a significant interval before enough counts occur to
- cause a counter to be incremented. Traffic would then appear
- to be very bursty, leading to incorrect conclusions of the
- network's performance.
-
- The alternative, which this memo adopts, is to provide
- expanded, 64 bit, counters. These counters are provided in
- two new groups, the "high capacity" packet counters group
- (ifHCPacketGroup) and byte counters group
- (ifHCCharacterGroup). These new groups provide new, 64 bit,
- counters for use as appropriate.
-
- The old, 32-bit, counters have not been deprecated. The 64-
- bit counters are to be used only the 32-bit counters do not
- provide enough capacity; that is, the 32 bit counters could
- wrap too fast.
-
- For interfaces that operate at 20,000,000 (20 million) bits
- per second or less, 32-bit counters should be used. For
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 13]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- interfaces that operate faster than 20,000,000 bits/second,
- 64-bit counters should be used.
-
- This speed was chosen as a reasonable compromise based on the
- following issues:
-
- (1) 64 bit counters are a new feature, introduced in SNMPv2.
- It is reasonable to expect that support for them will be
- spotty for the immediate future. Thus, we wish to limit
- them to as few systems as possible. This, in effect,
- means that 64-bit counters should be limited to higher
- speed interfaces. Ethernet (10,000,000 bps) and Token
- Ring (16,000,000 bps) are fairly wide-spread so it seems
- reasonable to not require 64-bit counters for these
- interfaces.
-
- (2) The minimum interval required for polling interfaces
- should be as long as possible. When running at full
- speed (i.e. back-to-back, maximum sized packets), for the
- following interfaces, the 32-bit ifxxxOctets counters
- will wrap in the stated times:
-
- - Ethernet will wrap in approximately 57 minutes,
-
- - Token Ring at 16 megabits will wrap in approximately
- 36 minutes,
-
- - A US T3 line, at 45 megabits, will wrap in
- approximately 12 minutes,
-
- - FDDI will wrap in approximately 5.7 minutes, and
-
- - A giga-bit link will wrap in about 34 seconds.
-
- (3) The required polling frequency should be somewhat higher
- than the counter wrap time. This is necessary in order
- to account for any possible packet transmission delays,
- as well as packet losses (including the attendant timeout
- and retransmission). We point out that, as network load
- goes up, the counters will count faster (thus reducing
- the time until the counter wraps) and transmission delays
- will increase.
-
- Based on these concerns, we have chosen 20,000,000 bits/second
- as a raw-link speed, below which 32-bit counters are
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 14]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- sufficient and above which, 64-bit counters should be used.
- This link speed will cause a 32-bit counter to wrap in just
- under 28 minutes. This provides an 8 minute margin of error
- when polling 16-megabit token ring.
-
- As an aside, a 1-terabit (1,000 gigabits) link will cause a 64
- bit counter to wrap in just under 5 years. Conversely, an
- 81,000,000 terabit/second link is required to cause a 64-bit
- counter to wrap in 30 minutes. We believe that, while
- technology rapidly marches forward, this link speed will not
- be achieved for at least several years, by which time we can
- consider introducing 128 bit counters.
-
-
- 3.2.6. Interface Speed
-
- In order to deal with increasing interface speeds, we have
- added an ifHighSpeed object.
-
- This object reports the speed of the interface in 1,000,000 (1
- million) bits/second units. Thus, the true speed of the
- interface will be the value reported by this object, plus or
- minus 500,000 bits/second.
-
- Other alternatives considered were:
-
- (1) Making the interface speed a 64-bit gauge. This was
- rejected since the current SMI and set of textual
- conventions do not include such an object. Therefore,
- such a textual convention would have to be defined, with
- the concomitant additional development efforts required.
-
- Furthermore, this path would require that an additional
- object be added to the MIB, replacing the current ifSpeed
- object. We would not be able to economize on MIB object
- counts. This path would also lead to confusion on the
- part of manager stations; some agents would have just
- ifSpeed, some would have just if64BitSpeed, and others
- would have both.
-
- Finally, this would require additional complexity in
- agents in that the instances in which 64-bit operations
- would be required would increase.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 15]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- (2) We also considered making "high-32 bit" and "low-32-bit"
- objects which, when combined, would be a 64-bit value.
- This simply seemed overly complex for what we are trying
- to do.
-
- Furthermore, a full 64-bits of precision does not seem
- necessary. IfHighSpeed will be the only report of
- interface speed for interfaces that are faster than
- 2,147,483,647 bits per second. At this speed, the
- granularity of ifHighSpeed will be 1,000,000 bits per
- second, thus the error will be 1/2147, or about 0.05%.
- This seems reasonable.
-
- (3) Adding a "scale" object, which would define the units
- which ifSpeed's value is.
-
- This would require two additional objects; One for the
- scaling object and one to replace the current ifSpeed.
- This later object is required since the semantics of
- ifSpeed would be significantly altered, and manager
- stations which do not understand the new semantics would
- be confused.
-
-
- 3.2.7. Multicast/Broadcast Counters
-
- To avoid the redundancy of counting all non-unicast packets as
- well as having individual multicast and broadcast packet
- counters, we deprecate the use of the non-unicast counters,
- which can be derived from the values of the others.
-
- For the broadcast and multicast counters defined in RFC 1229,
- their definitions varied slightly from the packet counters in
- the ifTable, in that they did not count discarded packets. To
- align the definitions better, the old counters are
- deprecatedand replaced by new definitions. 64-bit versions of
- these counters are also needed as explained above.
-
-
- 4. Use of the Interface Test Table
-
- This section is a description of the use of the Interface Test
- Table mostly copied from section 4.2 of RFC 1229 [7]. The
- only change is the addition of ifExtnsTestContext. When the
- Interface Test Table is accessed via SNMPv2,
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 16]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ifExtnsTestContext records the context used, and
- ifExtnsTestCommunity is set to the zero-length string; when
- the Interface Test Table is accessed via SNMPv1,
- ifExtnsTestCommunity records the community used, and
- ifExtnsTestContext is set to { 0 0 }.
-
- The Interface Test Table defines objects which allow a network
- manager to instruct an agent to test an interface for various
- faults. A few common types of tests are defined in this memo
- but most will be defined elsewhere dependent on the particular
- type of interface. After invoking a test, the object
- ifExtnsTestResult can be read to determine the outcome. If an
- agent can not perform the test, ifExtnsTestResult is set to so
- indicate. The object ifExtnsTestCode can be used to provide
- further test-specific or interface-specific (or even
- enterprise-specific) information concerning the outcome of the
- test. Only one test can be in progress on each interface at
- any one time. If one test is in progress when another test is
- invoked, the second test is rejected. Some agents may reject
- a test when a prior test is active on another interface.
-
- When a test is invoked, the identity of the originator of the
- request and the request-id are saved by the agent in the
- objects ifExtnsTestRequestId and either ifExtnsTestContext or
- ifExtnsTestCommunity. These values remain set until the next
- test is invoked. In the (rare) event that the invocation of
- tests by two network managers were to overlap, then there is a
- possibility that the first test's results might be overwritten
- by the second test's results prior to the first results being
- read. This unlikely circumstance can be detected by a network
- manager retrieving ifExtnsTestRequestId and either
- ifExtnsTestCommunity or ifExtnsTestContext, at the same time
- as the test results are retrieved, and ensuring that the
- results are for the desired request.
-
- In general, a Management station must not retransmit a request
- to invoke a test for which it does not receive a response;
- instead, it properly inspects an agent's MIB to determine if
- the invocation was successful. Only if the invocation was
- unsuccessful, is the invocation request retransmitted.
-
- Some tests may require the interface to be taken off-line in
- order to execute them, or may even require the agent to reboot
- after completion of the test. In these circumstances,
- communication with the management station invoking the test
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 17]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- may be lost until after completion of the test. The agent
- should make every effort to transmit a response to the request
- which invoked the test prior to losing communication. When
- the agent is restored to normal service, the results of the
- test are properly made available in the appropriate objects.
- Note that this requires that the ifIndex value assigned to an
- interface must be unchanged even if the test causes a reboot.
- An agent must reject any test for which it cannot, perhaps due
- to resource constraints, make available at least the minimum
- amount of information after that test completes.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 18]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- 5. Definitions
-
- IF-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
-
- IMPORTS
- MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, Counter32, Gauge32,
- Integer32, TimeTicks, experimental FROM SNMPv2-SMI
- DisplayString, PhysAddress, RowStatus FROM SNMPv2-TC
- MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF
- mib-2, interfaces FROM RFC-1213;
-
- -- from RFC 1239
- ifExtensions OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mib-2 12 }
-
- ifMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
- LAST-UPDATED "9306282355Z"
- ORGANIZATION "IETF Interfaces MIB Working Group"
- CONTACT-INFO
- " Keith McCloghrie
- Hughes LAN Systems
- 1225 Charleston Road
- Mountain View, Ca. 94043
-
- Tel: 415-966-7934
- Fax: 415-966-7980
- E-mail: kzm@hls.com."
- DESCRIPTION
- "The MIB module to describe generic objects for
- network interface sub-layers. This MIB is an
- updated version of MIB-II's ifTable, and
- incorporates the extensions defined in RFC 1229."
- ::= { experimental xx }
-
- ifMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ifMIB 1 }
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 19]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- -- the Interfaces group
-
- ifNumber OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Integer32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of network interfaces (regardless of
- their current state) present on this system."
- ::= { interfaces 1 }
-
-
- -- the Interfaces table
-
- -- The Interfaces table contains information on the entity's
- -- interfaces. Each sub-layer below the internetwork-layer
- -- of a network interface is considered to be an interface.
-
- ifTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IfEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A list of interface entries. The number of
- entries is given by the value of ifNumber."
- ::= { interfaces 2 }
-
- ifEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "An entry containing management information
- applicable to a particular interface."
- INDEX { ifIndex }
- ::= { ifTable 1 }
-
- IfEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- ifIndex Integer32,
- ifDescr DisplayString,
- ifType INTEGER,
- ifMtu Integer32,
- ifSpeed Gauge32,
- ifPhysAddress PhysAddress,
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 20]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ifAdminStatus INTEGER,
- ifOperStatus INTEGER,
- ifLastChange TimeTicks,
- ifInOctets Counter32,
- ifInUcastPkts Counter32,
- ifInNUcastPkts Counter32,
- ifInDiscards Counter32,
- ifInErrors Counter32,
- ifInUnknownProtos Counter32,
- ifOutOctets Counter32,
- ifOutUcastPkts Counter32,
- ifOutNUcastPkts Counter32,
- ifOutDiscards Counter32,
- ifOutErrors Counter32,
- ifOutQLen Gauge32,
- ifSpecific OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- ifName DisplayString,
- ifInMulticastPkts Counter32,
- ifInBroadcastPkts Counter32,
- ifOutMulticastPkts Counter32,
- ifOutBroadcastPkts Counter32,
- ifHCInOctets Counter64,
- ifHCInUcastPkts Counter64,
- ifHCInMulticastPkts Counter64,
- ifHCInBroadcastPkts Counter64,
- ifHCInDiscards Counter64,
- ifHCInErrors Counter64,
- ifHCInUnknownProtos Counter64,
- ifHCOutOctets Counter64,
- ifHCOutUcastPkts Counter64,
- ifHCOutMulticastPkts Counter64,
- ifHCOutBroadcastPkts Counter64,
- ifHCOutDiscards Counter64,
- ifHCOutErrors Counter64,
- ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable INTEGER,
- ifHighSpeed Gauge32
- }
-
- ifIndex OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Integer32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A unique value, greater than zero, for each
- interface. It is recommended that values are
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 21]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- assigned contiguously starting from 1. The value
- for each interface sub-layer must remain constant
- at least from one re-initialization of the
- entity's network management system to the next
- re-initialization."
- ::= { ifEntry 1 }
-
- ifDescr OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString (SIZE (0..255))
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A textual string containing information about the
- interface. This string should include the name of
- the manufacturer, the product name and the version
- of the interface hardware/software."
- ::= { ifEntry 2 }
-
- ifType OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- other(1), -- none of the following
- regular1822(2),
- hdh1822(3),
- ddn-x25(4),
- rfc877-x25(5),
- ethernet-csmacd(6),
- iso88023-csmacd(7),
- iso88024-tokenBus(8),
- iso88025-tokenRing(9),
- iso88026-man(10),
- starLan(11),
- proteon-10Mbit(12),
- proteon-80Mbit(13),
- hyperchannel(14),
- fddi(15),
- lapb(16),
- sdlc(17),
- ds1(18), -- T-1
- e1(19), -- european equiv. of T-1
- basicISDN(20),
- primaryISDN(21), -- proprietary serial
- propPointToPointSerial(22),
- ppp(23),
- softwareLoopback(24),
- eon(25), -- CLNP over IP (RFC 1070)
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 22]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ethernet-3Mbit(26),
- nsip(27), -- XNS over IP
- slip(28), -- generic SLIP
- ultra(29), -- ULTRA technologies
- ds3(30), -- T-3
- sip(31), -- SMDS
- frame-relay(32)
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The type of interface."
- ::= { ifEntry 3 }
-
- ifMtu OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Integer32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The size of the largest datagram which can be
- sent/received on the interface, specified in
- octets. For interfaces that are used for
- transmitting network datagrams, this is the size
- of the largest network datagram that can be sent
- on the interface."
- ::= { ifEntry 4 }
-
- ifSpeed OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Gauge32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "An estimate of the interface's current bandwidth
- in bits per second. For interfaces which do not
- vary in bandwidth or for those where no accurate
- estimation can be made, this object should contain
- the nominal bandwidth. If the bandwidth of the
- interface is greater than the maximum value
- reportable by this object then this object should
- report its maximum value (2,147,483,647) and
- ifHighSpeed must be used to report the interace's
- speed. For a sub-layer which has no concept of
- bandwidth, this object should be zero."
- ::= { ifEntry 5 }
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 23]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ifPhysAddress OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX PhysAddress
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The interface's address at its protocol sub-
- layer. The interface's medium-specific MIB must
- define the bit and byte ordering and format of the
- value contained by this object. For interfaces
- which do not have such an address (e.g., a serial
- line), this object should contain an octet string
- of zero length."
- ::= { ifEntry 6 }
-
- ifAdminStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- up(1), -- ready to pass packets
- down(2),
- testing(3) -- in some test mode
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The desired state of the interface. The
- testing(3) state indicates that no operational
- packets can be passed."
- ::= { ifEntry 7 }
-
- ifOperStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- up(1), -- ready to pass packets
- down(2),
- testing(3) -- in some test mode
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The current operational state of the interface.
- The testing(3) state indicates that no operational
- packets can be passed."
- ::= { ifEntry 8 }
-
- ifLastChange OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX TimeTicks
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 24]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of sysUpTime at the time the interface
- entered its current operational state. If the
- current state was entered prior to the last re-
- initialization of the local network management
- subsystem, then this object contains a zero
- value."
- ::= { ifEntry 9 }
-
- ifInOctets OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of octets received on the
- interface, including framing characters."
- ::= { ifEntry 10 }
-
- ifInUcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-
- layer to a higher (sub-)layer, which were not
- addressed to a multicast or broadcast address at
- this sub-layer."
- ::= { ifEntry 11 }
-
- ifInNUcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS deprecated
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-
- layer to a higher (sub-)layer, which were
- addressed to a multicast or broadcast address at
- this sub-layer.
-
- This object is deprecated in favour of
- ifInMulticastPkts and ifInBroadcastPkts."
- ::= { ifEntry 12 }
-
- ifInDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 25]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of inbound packets which were chosen
- to be discarded even though no errors had been
- detected to prevent their being deliverable to a
- higher-layer protocol. One possible reason for
- discarding such a packet could be to free up
- buffer space."
- ::= { ifEntry 13 }
-
- ifInErrors OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of inbound packets that contained
- errors preventing them from being deliverable to a
- higher-layer protocol."
- ::= { ifEntry 14 }
-
- ifInUnknownProtos OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets received via the interface
- which were discarded because of an unknown or
- unsupported protocol."
- ::= { ifEntry 15 }
-
- ifOutOctets OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of octets transmitted out of the
- interface, including framing characters."
- ::= { ifEntry 16 }
-
- ifOutUcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 26]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of packets that higher-level
- protocols requested be transmitted, and which were
- not addressed to a multicast or broadcast address
- at this sub-layer, including those that were
- discarded or not sent."
- ::= { ifEntry 17 }
-
- ifOutNUcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS deprecated
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of packets that higher-level
- protocols requested be transmitted, and which were
- addressed to a multicast or broadcast address at
- this sub-layer, including those that were
- discarded or not sent.
-
- This object is deprecated in favour of
- ifOutMulticastPkts and ifOutBroadcastPkts."
- ::= { ifEntry 18 }
-
- ifOutDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of outbound packets which were chosen
- to be discarded even though no errors had been
- detected to prevent their being transmitted. One
- possible reason for discarding such a packet could
- be to free up buffer space."
- ::= { ifEntry 19 }
-
- ifOutErrors OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of outbound packets that could not be
- transmitted because of errors."
- ::= { ifEntry 20 }
-
- ifOutQLen OBJECT-TYPE
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 27]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- SYNTAX Gauge32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The length of the output packet queue (in
- packets)."
- ::= { ifEntry 21 }
-
- ifSpecific OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A reference to MIB definitions specific to the
- particular media being used to realize the
- interface. For example, if the interface is
- realized by an ethernet, then the value of this
- object refers to a document defining objects
- specific to ethernet. If this information is not
- present, its value should be set to the OBJECT
- IDENTIFIER { 0 0 }, which is a syntactically valid
- object identifier, and any conformant
- implementation of ASN.1 and BER must be able to
- generate and recognize this value."
- ::= { ifEntry 22 }
-
- ifName OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The textual name of the interface which this
- ifEntry comprises. The value of this object
- should be the name of the interface as assigned by
- the host and should be suitable for use in
- commands entered at the host's `console'. This
- might be a text name, such as `le0' or a simple
- port number, such as `1', depending on the
- interface naming syntax of the host. If there are
- several ifEntrys that comprise the interface, then
- each will have the same value of ifName. If there
- is no local name, or this object is otherwise not
- applicable, then this object contains a 0-length
- string. "
- ::= { ifEntry 23 }
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 28]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ifInMulticastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-
- layer to a higher (sub-)layer, which were
- addressed to a multicast address at this sub-
- layer. For a MAC layer protocol, this includes
- both Group and Functional addresses."
- ::= { ifEntry 24 }
-
- ifInBroadcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-
- layer to a higher (sub-)layer, which were
- addressed to a broadcast address at this sub-
- layer."
- ::= { ifEntry 25 }
-
- ifOutMulticastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of packets that higher-level
- protocols requested be transmitted, and which were
- addressed to a multicast address at this sub-
- layer, including those that were discarded or not
- sent. For a MAC layer protocol, this includes
- both Group and Functional addresses."
- ::= { ifEntry 26 }
-
- ifOutBroadcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of packets that higher-level
- protocols requested be transmitted, and which were
- addressed to a broadcast address at this sub-
- layer, including those that were discarded or not
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 29]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- sent."
- ::= { ifEntry 27 }
-
- --
- -- High Capacity Counter objects. These objects are all
- -- 64 bit versions of the "basic" ifEntry counters. These
- -- objects all have the same basic semantics as their 32-bit
- -- counterparts, however, their syntax has been extended
- -- to 64 bits.
- --
-
- ifHCInOctets OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of octets received on the
- interface, including framing characters. This
- object is a 64-bit version of ifInOctets."
- ::= { ifEntry 28 }
-
- ifHCInUcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-
- layer to a higher (sub-)layer, which were not
- addressed to a multicast or broadcast address at
- this sub-layer. This object is a 64-bit version
- of ifInUcastPkts."
- ::= { ifEntry 29 }
-
- ifHCInMulticastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-
- layer to a higher (sub-)layer, which were
- addressed to a multicast address at this sub-
- layer. For a MAC layer protocol, this includes
- both Group and Functional addresses. This object
- is a 64-bit version of ifInMulticastPkts."
- ::= { ifEntry 30 }
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 30]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ifHCInBroadcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-
- layer to a higher (sub-)layer, which were
- addressed to a broadcast address at this sub-
- layer. This object is a 64-bit version of
- ifInBroadcastPkts."
- ::= { ifEntry 31 }
-
- ifHCInDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of inbound packets which were chosen
- to be discarded even though no errors had been
- detected to prevent their being deliverable to a
- higher (sub-)layer. One possible reason for
- discarding such a packet could be to free up
- buffer space. This object is a 64-bit version of
- ifInDiscards."
- ::= { ifEntry 32 }
-
- ifHCInErrors OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of inbound packets that contained
- errors preventing them from being deliverable to a
- higher (sub-)layer. This object is a 64-bit
- version of ifInErrors."
- ::= { ifEntry 33 }
-
- ifHCInUnknownProtos OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of packets received via the interface
- which were discarded because of an unknown or
- unsupported protocol. This object is a 64-bit
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 31]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- version of ifInUnknownProtos."
- ::= { ifEntry 34 }
-
- ifHCOutOctets OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of octets transmitted out of the
- interface, including framing characters. This
- object is a 64-bit version of ifOutOctets."
- ::= { ifEntry 35 }
-
- ifHCOutUcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of packets that higher-level
- protocols requested be transmitted, and which were
- not addressed to a multicast or broadcast address
- at this sub-layer, including those that were
- discarded or not sent. This object is a 64-bit
- version of ifOutUcastPkts."
- ::= { ifEntry 36 }
-
- ifHCOutMulticastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The total number of packets that higher-level
- protocols requested be transmitted, and which were
- addressed to a multicast address at this sub-
- layer, including those that were discarded or not
- sent. For a MAC layer protocol, this includes
- both Group and Functional addresses. This object
- is a 64-bit version of ifOutMulticastPkts."
- ::= { ifEntry 37 }
-
- ifHCOutBroadcastPkts OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 32]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- "The total number of packets that higher-level
- protocols requested be transmitted, and which were
- addressed to a broadcast address at this sub-
- layer, including those that were discarded or not
- sent. This object is a 64-bit version of
- ifOutBroadcastPkts."
- ::= { ifEntry 38 }
-
- ifHCOutDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of outbound packets which were chosen
- to be discarded even though no errors had been
- detected to prevent their being transmitted. One
- possible reason for discarding such a packet could
- be to free up buffer space. This object is a 64-
- bit version of ifOutDiscards."
- ::= { ifEntry 39 }
-
- ifHCOutErrors OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter64
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of outbound packets that could not be
- transmitted because of errors. This object is a
- 64-bit version of ifOutErrors."
- ::= { ifEntry 40 }
-
- ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER { enabled(1), disabled(2) }
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "Indicates whether linkUp/linkDown traps should be
- generated for this interface.
-
- By default, this object should have the value
- enabled(1) for interfaces which do not operate on
- 'top' of any other interface (as defined in the
- ifStackTable), and disabled(2) otherwise."
- ::= { ifEntry 41 }
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 33]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ifHighSpeed OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Gauge32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "An estimate of the interface's current bandwidth
- in units of 1,000,000 bits per second. If this
- object reports a value of `n' then the speed of
- the interface is somewhere in the range of `n-
- 500,000' to `n+499,999'. For interfaces which do
- not vary in bandwidth or for those where no
- accurate estimation can be made, this object
- should contain the nominal bandwidth. For a sub-
- layer which has no concept of bandwidth, this
- object should be zero."
- ::= { ifEntry 42 }
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 34]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- --
- -- The Interface Stack Group
- --
- -- Implementation of this group is mandatory for all systems
- --
-
- ifStackTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IfStackEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The table containing information on the
- relationships between the multiple sub-layers of
- network interfaces. In particular, it contains
- information on which sub-layers run 'on top of'
- which other sub-layers. Each sub-layer
- corresponds to a conceptual row in the ifTable."
- ::= { ifMIBObjects 1 }
-
-
- ifStackEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfStackEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "Information on a particular relationship between
- two sub-layers, specifying that one sub-layer runs
- on 'top' of the other sub-layer. Each sub-layer
- corresponds to a conceptual row in the ifTable."
- INDEX { ifStackHigherLayer, ifStackLowerLayer }
- ::= { ifStackTable 1 }
-
-
- IfStackEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- ifStackHigherLayer Integer32,
- ifStackLowerLayer Integer32,
- ifStackStatus RowStatus
- }
-
-
- ifStackHigherLayer OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Integer32
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 35]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of ifIndex corresponding to the higher
- sub-layer of the relationship, i.e., the sub-layer
- which runs on 'top' of the sub-layer identified by
- the corresponding instance of ifStackLowerLayer.
- If there is no higher sub-layer (below the
- internetwork layer), then this object has the
- value 0."
- ::= { ifStackEntry 1 }
-
-
- ifStackLowerLayer OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Integer32
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of ifIndex corresponding to the lower
- sub-layer of the relationship, i.e., the sub-layer
- which runs 'below' the sub-layer identified by the
- corresponding instance of ifStackHigherLayer. If
- there is no lower sub-layer, then this object has
- the value 0."
- ::= { ifStackEntry 2 }
-
-
- ifStackStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX RowStatus
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The status of the relationship between two sub-
- layers.
-
- Changing the value of this object from 'active' to
- 'notInService' or 'destroy' will likely have
- consequences up and down the interface stack.
- Thus, write access to this object is likely to be
- inappropriate for some types of interfaces, and
- many implementations will choose not to support
- write-access for any type of interface."
- ::= { ifStackEntry 3 }
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 36]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- -- Interface Extension Table
- --
- -- This group of objects is mandatory for all types of
- -- subnetwork interface.
-
- ifExtnsTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IfExtnsEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A list of interfaces extension entries. The
- number of entries is given by the value of
- ifNumber."
- ::= { ifExtensions 1 }
-
- ifExtnsEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfExtnsEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "An extension to the ifTable containing additional
- objects at the subnetwork layer and below for a
- particular interface."
- AUGMENTS { ifEntry }
- ::= { ifExtnsTable 1 }
-
- IfExtnsEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- ifExtnsChipSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- ifExtnsRevWare DisplayString,
- ifExtnsPromiscuous INTEGER
- }
-
- ifExtnsChipSet OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object identifies the hardware chip set
- being used in the interface. The assignment of
- OBJECT IDENTIFIERs to various types of hardware
- chip sets is defined elsewhere. If the hardware
- chip set is unknown, the object identifier
-
- unknownChipSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 0 0 }
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 37]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- is returned. Note that unknownChipSet is a
- syntactically valid object identifier, and any
- conformant implementation of ASN.1 and the BER
- must be able to generate and recognize this
- value."
- ::= { ifExtnsEntry 2 }
-
- ifExtnsRevWare OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString (SIZE (0..255))
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "An arbitrary octet string that describes the
- firmware version of this interface. It is
- intended that this should be human readable. It
- must only contain ASCII printable characters.
- Typically this will be the firmware version of the
- main interface software."
- ::= { ifExtnsEntry 3 }
-
- ifExtnsPromiscuous OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- true(1),
- false(2)
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object has a value of false(2) if this
- interface only accepts packets/frames that are
- addressed to this station. This object has a value
- of true(1) when the station accepts all
- packets/frames transmitted on the media. The
- value true(1) is only legal on certain types of
- media. If legal, setting this object to a value
- of true(1) may require the interface to be reset
- before becoming effective."
- ::= { ifExtnsEntry 8 }
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 38]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- --
- -- The Interface Test Table
- --
- -- This group of objects is optional.
-
- ifExtnsTestTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IfExtnsTestEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This table contains one entry per interface."
- ::= { ifExtensions 2 }
-
- ifExtnsTestEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfExtnsTestEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "An entry containing objects for invoking tests on
- an interface."
- AUGMENTS { ifEntry }
- ::= { ifExtnsTestTable 1 }
-
- IfExtnsTestEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- ifExtnsTestCommunity OCTET STRING,
- ifExtnsTestRequestId INTEGER,
- ifExtnsTestType OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- ifExtnsTestResult INTEGER,
- ifExtnsTestCode OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- ifExtnsTestContext OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- }
-
- ifExtnsTestCommunity OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OCTET STRING
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object contains the name of the SNMPv1
- authentication community (see RFC 1157) which was
- used to authenticate the SNMPv1 message which
- invoked the current or most recent test on this
- interface. If the authentication community is
- unknown or undefined, or the current or more
- recent test was invoked with an SNMPv2 message,
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 39]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- then this value contains the zero-length string."
- ::= { ifExtnsTestEntry 2 }
-
- ifExtnsTestRequestId OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object contains the value of the request-id
- field in the SNMP PDU (see RFCs 1157 and 1448)
- which invoked the current or most recent test on
- this interface. If the request-id is unknown or
- undefined, this value contains the value zero."
- ::= { ifExtnsTestEntry 3 }
-
- ifExtnsTestType OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A control variable used to start and stop
- operator-initiated interface tests. Most OBJECT
- IDENTIFIER values assigned to tests are defined
- elsewhere, in associ- ation with specific types of
- interface. However, this document assigns a value
- for a full-duplex loopback test, and defines the
- special meanings of the subject identifier:
-
- noTest OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 0 0 }
-
- When the value noTest is written to this object,
- no action is taken unless a test is in progress,
- in which case the test is aborted. Writing any
- other value to this object is only valid when no
- test is currently in progress, in which case the
- indicated test is initiated. Note that noTest is
- a syntactically valid object identifier, and any
- conformant implementation of ASN.1 and BER must be
- able to generate and recognize this value.
-
- When read, this object always returns the most
- recent value that ifExtnsTestType was set to. If
- it has not been set since the last initialization
- of the network management subsystem on the agent,
- a value of noTest is returned."
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 40]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ::= { ifExtnsTestEntry 4 }
-
- wellKnownTests OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ifExtensions 4 }
-
- -- full-duplex loopback test
- testFullDuplexLoopBack OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { wellKnownTests 1 }
-
- ifExtnsTestResult OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- none(1), -- no test yet requested
- success(2),
- inProgress(3),
- notSupported(4),
- unAbleToRun(5), -- due to state of system
- aborted(6),
- failed(7)
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object contains the result of the most
- recently requested test, or the value none(1) if
- no tests have been requested since the last reset.
- Note that this facility provides no provision for
- saving the results of one test when starting
- another, as could be required if used by multiple
- managers concurrently."
- ::= { ifExtnsTestEntry 5 }
-
- ifExtnsTestCode OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object contains a code which contains more
- specific information on the test result, for
- example an error-code after a failed test. Error
- codes and other values this object may take are
- specific to the type of interface and/or test.
- However, one subject identifier:
-
- testCodeUnknown OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 0 0 }
-
- for use if no additional result code is available.
- Note that testCodeUnknown is a syntactically valid
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 41]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- object identifier, and any conformant
- implementation of ASN.1 and the BER must be able
- to generate and recognize this value."
- ::= { ifExtnsTestEntry 6 }
-
- ifExtnsTestContext OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object contains the identity of the SNMPv2
- context referenced by the SNMPv2 Message which
- invoked the current or most recent test on this
- interface. If the current or most recent test was
- invoked by an SNMPv1 message, then this object
- contains the value { 0 0 }."
- ::= { ifExtnsTestEntry 7 }
-
-
- -- Generic Receive Address Table
- --
- -- This group of objects is mandatory for all types of
- -- interfaces which can receive packets/frames addressed to
- -- more than one address.
- --
- -- This conceptual table has been deprecated since the
- -- semantics of adding and deleting conceptual rows have
- -- been changed by the replacement of ifExtnsRcvAddrStatus
- -- with ifRcvAddrStatus which uses the RowStatus Textual
- -- convention.
-
- ifExtnsRcvAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IfExtnsRcvAddrEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS deprecated
- DESCRIPTION
- "This table contains an entry for each address
- (broadcast, multicast, or uni-cast) for which the
- system will receive packets/frames on a particular
- interface, except as follows:
-
- - for an interface operating in promiscuous mode,
- entries are only required for those addresses for
- which the system would receive frames were it not
- operating in promiscuous mode.
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 42]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- - for 802.5 functional addresses, only one entry
- is required, for the address which has the
- functional address bit ANDed with the bit mask of
- all functional addresses for which the interface
- will accept frames."
- ::= { ifExtensions 3 }
-
- ifExtnsRcvAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfExtnsRcvAddrEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS deprecated
- DESCRIPTION
- "A list of objects identifying an address for
- which the system will accept packets/frames on the
- particular interface identified by the index value
- ifIndex."
- INDEX { ifIndex, ifExtnsRcvAddrAddress }
- ::= { ifExtnsRcvAddrTable 1 }
-
- IfExtnsRcvAddrEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- ifExtnsRcvAddrAddress PhysAddress,
- ifExtnsRcvAddrStatus INTEGER
- }
-
- ifExtnsRcvAddrAddress OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX PhysAddress
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS deprecated
- DESCRIPTION
- "An address for which the system will accept
- packets/frames on this entry's interface."
- ::= { ifExtnsRcvAddrEntry 2 }
-
- ifExtnsRcvAddrStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- other(1),
- invalid(2),
- volatile(3),
- nonVolatile(4)
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS deprecated
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object has the value nonVolatile(4) for
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 43]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- those entries in the table which are valid and
- will not be deleted by the next restart of the
- managed system. Entries having the value
- volatile(3) are valid and exist, but have not been
- saved, so that will not exist after the next
- restart of the managed system. Entries having the
- value other(1) are valid and exist but are not
- classified as to whether they will continue to
- exist after the next restart. Entries having the
- value invalid(2) are invalid and do not represent
- an address for which an interface accepts frames.
-
- Setting an object instance to one of the values
- other(1), volatile(3), or nonVolatile(4) causes
- the corresponding entry to exist or continue to
- exist, and to take on the respective status as
- regards the next restart of the managed system.
-
- Setting an object instance to the value invalid(2)
- causes the corresponding entry to become invalid
- or cease to exist. Note that it may be
- inappropriate for some addresses to be
- invalidated. Accordingly, an agent may return an
- error response if a management station attempts to
- change this object to an inappropriate value.
-
- It is an implementation-specific matter as to
- whether the agent removes an invalidated entry
- from the table. Accordingly, management stations
- must be prepared to receive tabular information
- from agents that corresponds to entries not
- currently in use. Proper interpretation of such
- entries requires examination of the relevant
- ifExtnsRcvAddrStatus object instance."
- DEFVAL { volatile }
- ::= { ifExtnsRcvAddrEntry 3 }
-
-
-
- -- Generic Receive Address Table
- --
- -- This group of objects is mandatory for all types of
- -- interfaces which can receive packets/frames addressed to
- -- more than one address.
- --
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 44]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- -- This table replaces the ifExtnsRcvAddr table. The main
- -- difference is that this table makes use of the RowStatus
- -- textual convention, while ifExtnsRcvAddr does not.
-
- ifRcvAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IfRcvAddrEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This table contains an entry for each address
- (broadcast, multicast, or uni-cast) for which the
- system will receive packets/frames on a particular
- interface, except as follows:
-
- - for an interface operating in promiscuous mode,
- entries are only required for those addresses for
- which the system would receive frames were it not
- operating in promiscuous mode.
-
- - for 802.5 functional addresses, only one entry
- is required, for the address which has the
- functional address bit ANDed with the bit mask of
- all functional addresses for which the interface
- will accept frames."
- ::= { ifMIBObjects 2 }
-
- ifRcvAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfRcvAddrEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A list of objects identifying an address for
- which the system will accept packets/frames on the
- particular interface identified by the index value
- ifIndex."
- INDEX { ifIndex, ifRcvAddrAddress }
- ::= { ifRcvAddrTable 1 }
-
- IfRcvAddrEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- ifRcvAddrAddress PhysAddress,
- ifRcvAddrStatus INTEGER,
- ifRcvAddrType
- }
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 45]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- ifRcvAddrAddress OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX PhysAddress
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "An address for which the system will accept
- packets/frames on this entry's interface."
- ::= { ifRcvAddrEntry 1 }
-
- ifRcvAddrStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX RowStatus
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object is used to create and delete rows in
- the ifRcvAddrTable."
-
- ::= { ifRcvAddrEntry 2 }
-
- ifRcvAddrType OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- other(1),
- volatile(2),
- nonVolatile(3)
- }
-
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object has the value nonVolatile(4) for
- those entries in the table which are valid and
- will not be deleted by the next restart of the
- managed system. Entries having the value
- volatile(3) are valid and exist, but have not been
- saved, so that will not exist after the next
- restart of the managed system. Entries having the
- value other(1) are valid and exist but are not
- classified as to whether they will continue to
- exist after the next restart. Entries having the
- value invalid(2) are invalid and do not represent
- an address for which an interface accepts frames.
-
- Setting an object instance to one of the values
- other(1), volatile(3), or nonVolatile(4) causes
- the corresponding entry to exist or continue to
- exist, and to take on the respective status as
- regards the next restart of the managed system.
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 46]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- DEFVAL { volatile }
- ::= { ifRcvAddrEntry 3 }
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 47]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- -- conformance information
-
- ifConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ifMIB 2 }
-
- ifGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ifConformance 1 }
- ifCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ifConformance 2 }
-
-
- -- compliance statements
-
- ifCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities
- which have network interfaces."
-
- MODULE -- this module
- MANDATORY-GROUPS { ifGeneralGroup, ifStackGroup }
-
- GROUP ifCharacterGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for those network
- interfaces which are character-oriented or
- packet-oriented and for which the value of the
- corresponding instance of ifSpeed is less than or
- equal to 20,000,000 bits/second."
-
- GROUP ifHCCharacterGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for those network
- interfaces which are character-oriented or
- packet-oriented and for which the value of the
- corresponding instance of ifSpeed is greater than
- 20,000,000 bits/second."
-
- GROUP ifPacketGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for those network
- interfaces which are packet-oriented and for which
- the value of the corresponding instance of ifSpeed
- is less than or equal to 20,000,000 bits/second."
-
- GROUP ifHCPacketGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for those network
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 48]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- interfaces which are packet-oriented and for which
- the value of the corresponding instance of ifSpeed
- is greater than 20,000,000 bits/second."
-
- GROUP ifTestGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is optional."
-
- GROUP ifRcvAddressGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for interfaces which
- can receive packets/frames addressed to more than
- one address."
-
- OBJECT ifExtnsPromiscuous
- MIN-ACCESS read-only
- DESCRIPTION
- "Write access is not required."
-
- OBJECT ifStackStatus
- SYNTAX INTEGER { active(1) } -- subset of RowStatus
- MIN-ACCESS read-only
- DESCRIPTION
- "Write access is not required, and only one of the
- six enumerated values for the RowStatus textual
- convention need be supported, specifically:
- active(1)."
- ::= { ifCompliances 1 }
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 49]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- -- units of conformance
-
- ifGeneralGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { ifDescr, ifType, ifSpeed, ifPhysAddress,
- ifAdminStatus, ifOperStatus, ifLastChange,
- ifSpecific, ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable,
- ifHighSpeed, ifExtnsChipSet, ifExtnsRevWare,
- ifExtnsPromiscuous }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing information
- applicable to all network interfaces."
- ::= { ifGroups 1 }
-
- ifCharacterGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { ifInOctets, ifOutOctets }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing information
- specific to low and medium speed (less than or
- equal to 20,000,000 bits/second) packet-oriented
- or character-oriented network interfaces."
- ::= { ifGroups 2 }
-
- ifHCCharacterGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { ifHCInOctets, ifHCOutOctets }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing information
- specific to high speed (greater than 20,000,000
- bits/second) packet-oriented or character-oriented
- network interfaces."
- ::= { ifGroups 3 }
-
- ifPacketGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { ifMtu, ifInUcastPkts, ifInMulticastPkts,
- ifInBroadcastPkts, ifInDiscards, ifInErrors,
- ifInUnknownProtos, ifOutUcastPkts,
- ifOutMulticastPkts, ifOutBroadcastPkts,
- ifOutDiscards, ifOutErrors, ifOutQLen }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing information
- specific to low and medium speed (less than or
- equal to 20,000,000 bits/second) packet-oriented
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 50]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- network interfaces."
- ::= { ifGroups 4 }
-
- ifHCPacketGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { ifMtu, ifHCInUcastPkts, ifHCInMulticastPkts,
- ifHCInBroadcastPkts, ifHCInDiscards, ifHCInErrors,
- ifHCInUnknownProtos, ifHCOutUcastPkts,
- ifHCOutMulticastPkts, ifHCOutBroadcastPkts,
- ifHCOutDiscards, ifHCOutErrors, ifHCOutQLen }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing information
- specific to high speed (greater than 20,000,000
- bits/second) packet-oriented network interfaces."
- ::= { ifGroups 5 }
-
- ifRcvAddressGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { ifRcvAddrStatus, ifRcvAddrType }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing information on
- the multiple addresses which an interface
- receives."
- ::= { ifGroups 6 }
-
- ifTestGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { ifExtnsTestCommunity, ifExtnsTestRequestId
- ifExtnsTestType, ifExtnsTestResult,
- ifExtnsTestCode, ifExtnsTestContext }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing the ability to
- invoke tests on an interface."
- ::= { ifGroups 7 }
-
- ifStackGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { ifStackStatus }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing information on
- the layering of MIB-II interfaces."
- ::= { ifGroups 8 }
-
- END
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 51]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- 6. Acknowledgements
-
- The proposals in this memo are the result of conversations and
- discussions with many people, including at least the
- following: Fred Baker, Ted Brunner, Chuck Davin, Jeremy
- Greene, Marshall Rose, Kaj Tesink, and Dean Throop. However,
- it does not necessarily represent any consensus among the
- above-mentioned.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 52]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- 7. References
-
- [1] J. Case, K. McCloghrie, M. Rose, and S. Waldbusser,
- Structure of Management Information for version 2 of the
- Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), Request for
- Comments 1442, April 1993.
-
-
- [2] J. Galvin, K. McCloghrie, Administrative Model for
- version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
- (SNMPv2), Request for Comments 1448, April 1993.
-
-
- [3] J. Case, K. McCloghrie, M. Rose, and S. Waldbusser,
- Protocol Operations for version 2 of the Simple Network
- Management Protocol (SNMPv2), Request for Comments 1448,
- April 1993.
-
-
- [4] K. McCloghrie and M.T. Rose, Management Information Base
- for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets - MIB-
- II, Request for Comments 1213. March 1991.
-
-
- [5] J.D. Case, M.S. Fedor, M.L. Schoffstall, and J.R. Davin,
- Simple Network Management Protocol, Request for Comments
- 1157. May 1990.
-
-
- [6] J. Postel, Internet Protocol, Request for Comments 791,
- September 1981.
-
-
- [7] K. McCloghrie, Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB,
- Request for Comments 1229, May 1991.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 53]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- 8. Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
-
- 9. Authors' Address
-
- Keith McCloghrie
- Hughes LAN Systems
- 1225 Charleston Rd,
- Mountain View, Ca 94043
- 415-966-7934
- kzm@hls.com
-
- Frank Kastenholz
- FTP Software
- 2 High Street
- North Andover, Mass. USA 01845
- (508)685-4000
- kasten@ftp.com
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 54]
-
-
-
-
- Draft Interfaces Group Evolution June 1993
-
-
- Table of Contents
-
-
- 1 Introduction .......................................... 2
- 2 The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework ............... 3
- 2.1 Object Definitions .................................. 3
- 3 Experience with the Interfaces Group .................. 4
- 3.1 Areas of Clarification/Revision ..................... 4
- 3.1.1 Interface Numbering ............................... 4
- 3.1.2 Interface Sub-Layers .............................. 5
- 3.1.3 Virtual Circuits .................................. 6
- 3.1.4 Bit and Character Oriented Interfaces ............. 6
- 3.1.5 Counter Size ...................................... 7
- 3.1.6 Interface Speed ................................... 7
- 3.1.7 Multicast/Broadcast Counters ...................... 7
- 3.2 Clarifications/Revisions ............................ 7
- 3.2.1 Interface Numbering ............................... 7
- 3.2.2 Interface Sub-Layers .............................. 9
- 3.2.3 Virtual Circuits .................................. 11
- 3.2.4 Bit and Character Oriented Interfaces ............. 12
- 3.2.5 Counter Size ...................................... 13
- 3.2.6 Interface Speed ................................... 15
- 3.2.7 Multicast/Broadcast Counters ...................... 16
- 4 Use of the Interface Test Table ....................... 16
- 5 Definitions ........................................... 19
- 6 Acknowledgements ...................................... 52
- 7 References ............................................ 53
- 8 Security Considerations ............................... 54
- 9 Authors' Address ...................................... 54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Expires December 1993 [Page 55]
-
-